Why Weight versus Normal Eating
Both Why Weight and Normal Eating are programs for helping people to overcome compulsive eating,
stop dieting, and eat normally, so of course there are some similarities. But there are also some
very significant differences.
1. Why Weight focuses on weight loss.
The most important difference between Why Weight and Normal Eating is that Why Weight,
like all Geneen Roth's books, focuses on weight loss as a goal. In fact, this is the biggest
difference between Normal Eating and all other non-diet approaches. I think that focusing on weight
loss as the goal is the single biggest reason that the non-diet approach doesn't work for people.
Making weight loss your goal is the tail wagging the dog - it doesn't work. You can't listen to your
body and trust what it's telling you if your mind is constantly trying to second guess it.
2. Why Weight correctly identifies the causes of emotional eating, but does
not give effective tools for applying this knowledge.
Geneen Roth went through a process of recovery with a therapist and can accurately describe the
key emotional issues that drive compulsive eating, but she's not a therapist herself (as she's the
first to admit) and her expertise is not in helping people to apply this knowledge. She can only
describe it. Her descriptions are movingly eloquent - she's a great writer - but a general
awareness that you eat when you feel angry (for example) does not help you to not eat when you're angry.
The Why Weight approach of having you write long essays about each general issue is not an
effective way to get at what's driving an individual's eating. Recovery doesn't happen in the
abstract, and it doesn't happen in after-the-fact in leisurely reflection. Recovery happens in the
moment that you have a craving to eat. That's when you have the opportunity for insight that is
actionable and leads to recovery. That's why Normal Eating so strongly emphasizes the importance
of pausing to reflect when you have a desire to eat when you're not hungry. Sitting with the
discomfort of the compulsion for long enough to realize what's triggering it is how you get well.
The exercises at the very beginning of Why Weight about imagining yourself fat or thin in
different situations comes from the guided fantasies in Fat is a Feminist Issue. I don't fault
Geneen for using a good idea - I did the same. The guided fantasies I developed for Normal
Eating (and which I'll be offering for sale in the coming weeks) were also inspired by ideas in
Fat is a Feminist Issue. I started there, and then changed and added things in ways I felt made
it more useful.
The problem with the Why Weight "imagine" exercises is that they use the essay-writing
vehicle (as with everything else), and that is not an effective method to get at these issues.
When you engage your left-brain by writing, you can't access your right-brain as freely, and
this is a right-brain exercise. Guided fantasies (sitting with your eyes closed while imagining
what a voice is describing) is dimensions more effective. There's no comparison. It's another
example of where Why Weight correctly identifies an important issue, but doesn't provide an effective
tool to apply this knowledge.
3. Why Weight lists four stages, but these are descriptive rather than prescriptive.
This is another example of how Why Weight describes the "destination", but not the path to get
there. The only similarity between the Why Weight stages and the Normal Eating stages is that there
are four of both.
The Why Weight stages describe what to expect - e.g. you'll be able to eat when hungry before
you can stop when full, the whole process will take you 1-2 years, etc. It's basically a description
of what will magically happen to you when you stop dieting, but it doesn't give you effective tools
to move you through the process.
These are the Why Weight stages:
I. Acknowledgement there's a problem.
II. Reaction against deprivation.
III. Identifying and solving all the problems that cause you to eat compulsively.
IV. Joy in recovery.
Stage III is the part that people have a trouble with, and that's what the Normal Eating stages
break down into subgoals, with tools to achieve these subgoals.
The Normal Eating stages are not descriptions of what you can expect; they are checkpoints on
the way to the ultimate goal - a roadmap for getting there. Each stage describes a key learning
that you need to achieve for recovery, and successive stages build upon the learning of the previous
stages. The four stages of Normal Eating, the learning goals at each stage, and the exercises for
achieving these subgoals are laid out in the ebook that you have access to after
becoming a member.
|